My Obsidian vault is maintained in DEVONthink so that I have access to the research notes from both apps. I’m experimenting with Obsidian for research.I use Apple Calendar for calendar events.I use Things 3 for project/task management and use DT links to link to notes in Things 3 (and other applications) as needed.IF/WHEN DT gets a suitable mobile app I may use it to take notes but for now, I use Drafts and send the notes to DT. I write all notes in markdown using Drafts. All notes and research are stored in DEVONthink.My simple setup, which works wonderfully for me, is as follows: I find Things 3 has all of the functionality I need while making it easier to maintain a bird’s eye view of my projects and for my use case, gets out of the way better than OF does. I mastered OmniFocus, setup custom perspectives, etc., but ultimately moved to Things 3. While Agenda can have tasks, it is not a task manager. I experimented with Agenda and I like it but I have dedicated myself to using markdown for all notes. If so, why the huge fan base for Omnifocus? In short - it seems to me at least on initial use that Agenda wins over Omnifocus on virtually every comparison point.
And a pricing plan which exudes confidence in their software - free to use except a subscription to pay for extra features. Much more intuitive to use, very well-done syncing and Sharing capabilities (both in and out of Agenda), plays very well with Hook, very innovative linking to the Mac Calendar or to other Agenda notes. I came across Agenda recently and have been blown away at least on initial trial over the last couple days. That said, I have tried a few times to learn Omnifocus and it has always seems too complex for the mission, with only marginally convenient syncing capability. It seems every review I read discusses Omnifocus as being the clear winner in this category, albeit at a considerably higher cost than its competitors. I am curious about opinions regarding Omnifocus vs Agenda for saving Tasks and miscellaneous notes.